4 ms·
I think the terminology you're using ("be okay") is so vague it doesn't mean anything here. You seem to be arguing your own personal value set without telling t
by thephyber 6y ago
I think the terminology you're using ("be okay") is so vague it doesn't mean anything here. You seem to be arguing your own personal value set without telling the rest of us what your values are or what ethical framework you are arguing in.
The only thing I can infer from this comment is that you aren't arguing within a legal framework (although I suspect you might be wrong because "unfair competitive advantage" is something that can be enforced under US and EU law).
- dathinab 6y agoI'm not a lawyer, anti trust law and monopoly law a rather complex and subtle things. Especially if we consider the difference between the intend behind a law and it's current legal interpretations. Because of this I try to avoid arguing using the actual laws. I also believe many of this laws need some degree of adaption to the modern world. Sometimes with changes in the law and sometimes with changes in the interpretation of the law. So yes it's no accidentally vague. More concrete would be : It should be illegal but might not be due to the law not being adapted to the dynamics of many modern markets. But that's still pretty vague tbh.