4 ms·
It could be the same. I always learned the explanation as: 1. Cool to freezing via evaporation. Because this goes as T^4, the time difference is negligible to
by brennanpeterson 6y ago
It could be the same.
I always learned the explanation as:
1. Cool to freezing via evaporation. Because this goes as T^4, the time difference is negligible to reach 0°C. But...hot water loses more volume.
2. Freeze, bit now you need less energy to freeze less material.
I did this at home, and the simple check worked: volume was lower in the frozen hot water.
This explanation might be wrong! But it works out in simple tests and mathematically.