4 ms·
The thing is, you're not paying 30%/15% extra - if I recall correctly, that is against the terms of the App Store. Developers/companies can't charge a markup to
by dhagz 6y ago
The thing is, you're not paying 30%/15% extra - if I recall correctly, that is against the terms of the App Store. Developers/companies can't charge a markup to make up for the bit Apple skims off the top - so instead of, say, Spotify getting all of my $10 from an IAP Premium subscription, they get $7. If I sign up for their premium service on their website, however, they get all $10.
- kn0where 6y agoNot true, for instance YouTube Premium charges more for subscriptions through the App Store than if you subscribe on YouTube.com
- RonanTheGrey 6y agoYouTube has negotiated a deal that allows this, as did Amazon Video and a few others. Only huge companies can do this, which further makes the argument that what Apple is doing is abusive.
- monocularvision 6y agoThis is not true. There is no rule that states you must offer the same price when signing up if your service is multi platform. The rules only state you can’t discourage In-App purchase. I use several services where I signed up on the website because it was substantially cheaper than in-app.
- jfim 6y agoThat basically just means that non Apple users are subsidizing the cost of Apple users, just like cash users are subsidizing credit card users [0]. [0] http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/08/28/how-credit-cards-force-the-poor-to-subsidize-the-rich/ http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/08/28/how-credit-...