> The fact is that the virus inhabits the lungs, and damages tissue as it replicates. Just because someone isn't having an acute symptomatic response doesn't me

> The fact is that the virus inhabits the lungs, and damages tissue as it replicates. Just because someone isn't having an acute symptomatic response doesn't mean that there couldn't be long term effects from infection If this is the way to treat with life, how would you be still alive? Isn’t it the very reason we get ill because the body is treating the virus. Do you have any source to believe that asymptomatic infected person has long term negative effects from infection?