3 ms·
They can try, but since it's not really possible to build Fortnite and make it run efficiently on mobile safari, I doubt they'll get very far. Section III is t
by asdfasgasdgasdg 6y ago
They can try, but since it's not really possible to build Fortnite and make it run efficiently on mobile safari, I doubt they'll get very far.
Section III is the missing piece of the legal puzzle for me. I have in the past been convinced that the presence of Android is sufficient to prevent a lawsuit like this from succeeding against Apple. But now I'm not so sure.
III. Competition in the Sale of Mobile Devices Cannot Discipline Apple’s Conduct
in the iOS App Distribution or iOS In-App Payment Processing Markets.
156. Competition in the sale of mobile devices cannot constrain Apple’s
anti-competitive conduct described in Parts I and II.
157. First, Apple’s power in the relevant markets described above is not
disciplined by competition in the sale of mobile devices because Apple mobile device
customers face significant switching costs and customer lock-in to Apple’s iOS
ecosystem.
How many news articles have we seen about the power of iMessage to keep people in the Apple ecosystem? It's gonna be hard for Apple to argue that they don't try to engender consumer lock in given their plain reluctance to interoperate and all the news articles talking about how strong this effect is.
I think Epic has a chance here. Certainly it's a gamble I'd love to see them win. IANAL.