3 ms·
I don't know if you've heard, but it's no longer enough to simply be "not in favor of riots", you must now be "actively anti-riots" — or so goes that other talk
by bhupy 6y ago
I don't know if you've heard, but it's no longer enough to simply be "not in favor of riots", you must now be "actively anti-riots" — or so goes that other talking point.
- nitrogen 6y agoIndeed we've gone from "if you're not with us you're against us" to "if you're not afainst them hard enough you're with them". It's divisive and contributes to the conflicts that keep us from finding common ground.