3 ms·
You can live in this world right now. 1. Snap and/or Flatpak allow you to install GUI applications from most places nowadays. The internal tooling (system pack
by igneo676 6y ago
You can live in this world right now.
1. Snap and/or Flatpak allow you to install GUI applications from most places nowadays. The internal tooling (system packages) are kept separate from the User installed applications and are effectively sandboxed in this way
2. Linuxbrew allows a Mac OS-like separation from your personal development tools and your OS's internal packages. Notably, this also allows you to install far newer tooling than your distribution would typically provide
3. Drop application binaries in ~/.local/bin if all else fails
If I weren't on a rolling release distribution I'd probably go that route. I hate being restricted by whatever my distro provides, I hate upgrading the entire world when new releases are made, and I hate third party repos and the hell the provide reconciling everything together.
It's really the in-between state that's terrible. Either go full *BSD or Mac OS and separate the concepts or full Arch Linux (w/ AUR) and don't. All other ways of distribution software tend to be more server centric anyway
- jabirali 6y ago> Either go full *BSD or Mac OS and separate the concepts or full Arch Linux (w/ AUR) and don't. Regarding the first alternative, I think it will be interesting to see how Fedora Silverblue [1] turns out. It’s basically going for an immutable base system coupled with Flatpak for apps the user installs. Haven’t tried it myself, but for average desktop users, I think that sounds like a very good solution in the long run: a stable base system with up-to-date user-facing apps. [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/ https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-silverblue/