4 ms·
Those numbers don't indicate who is right or who is wrong. Who is justified and who isn't. Just who is better at killing.
by revnode 6y ago
Those numbers don't indicate who is right or who is wrong. Who is justified and who isn't. Just who is better at killing.
- helge9210 6y agoIf you detain and imprison eight year old kid, grabbing him from school, it is reasonable to assume, that his father, his grandfather, his older and younger brothers will hold a grudge, so to speak.
- revnode 6y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Murdered_Israeli_children https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Murdered_Israeli_chil... There's literally a Wikipedia category for Israeli children that were murdered. If you murder a child, then "it is reasonable to assume, that his father, his grandfather, his older and younger brothers will hold a grudge, so to speak." Let me know if you see a point to this conversation, because I don't see it.
- helge9210 6y agoI don't know who you are and what are your reasons, but I pay for our military and security forces with my taxes. It is my right to demand from them not to murder or terrorize civilians.
- Udik 6y agoThat's not even an issue. There are two parties who are having a dispute; one of the two parties has appropriated something from the other. You don't need to know who gave more blows to understand who's in the wrong here. However, it happens in this case that the thief is also the person who inflicted more injuries on the other.
- revnode 6y agoYou're literally commenting on an article where Israel has sought and won peace with a neighbor. Whatever land was appropriated, was done so as a result of Arab aggression and Israel has repeatedly offered to give it back for peace. It has already done so repeatedly with other Arab neighbors. So yeah, you can definitely understand who is in the wrong here.
- Udik 6y ago> Whatever land was appropriated, was done so as a result of Arab aggression What part of "it's illegal to appropriate someone's land even after an aggression" you don't understand? And it's illegal for a reason, not because the international community is evil. Also, what aggression specifically gave Israel permission to settle hundreds of thousands of people in the West Bank in the last 20 years? > Israel has repeatedly offered to give it back for peace Peace comes after Israel has returned what has misappropriated, not before. This seems pretty obvious to me. Even more obvious is that if Israel had any intention to give the land back in any foreseeable future, it wouldn't have built entire f.....g cities on it! Seriously, I can't understand if you're trying to deceive only me or yourself too.
- revnode 6y ago> it wouldn't have built entire f.....g cities on it! So is your position that Jews are not allowed to live in certain places on this planet? Tell me more.
- Udik 6y agoReally? Your objection to the fact that a country is not allowed to build cities on occupied territories is "are you saying Jews are not allowed to live there"?. Haha. Sorry, that is funny. Well, you know, it's not really about Jews...
- helge9210 6y agoNot "Jews" -- citizens of Israel. It is not allowed to transfer own population to occupied territory. It is an obligation Israel admitted by signing Geneva accords