4 ms·
Why not just pay this 60$/year? I mean if it's something important then it's worth paying for. If not - there is cheaper storage available when one can archive
by jacekm 6y ago
Why not just pay this 60$/year? I mean if it's something important then it's worth paying for. If not - there is cheaper storage available when one can archive their containers.
- klysm 6y agoI agree it’s probably better to just pay, but certainly if it’s that cheap to circumvent then people will do it to save $60
- res0nat0r 6y agoEveryone should just start using Googles Cloud Build service IMO, it will cost you pennies. You can literally just do a `docker build -t gcr.io/project/image:0.0.1` and it will automatically tar up and send your build directly to their build service and create the container. It's about the cheapest and easiest build service I've seen. https://cloud.google.com/cloud-build https://cloud.google.com/cloud-build
- mamurphy 6y agoIs there any special evidence to suggest this service will exist a year from now?
- dividedbyzero 6y agoI believe the GCP stuff is relatively stable, at least nothing we're using has disappeared so far over about 3 years (several have been renamed and consolidated, though, but without breaking anything already existing)
- res0nat0r 6y agoLol Google spent over a billion dollars building out their cloud offerings, just last year. The silly cynical view on HN that everything Google runs goes away doesn't apply to their multi-continent multi-billion dollar cloud business.
- dividedbyzero 6y agoNot a lot of money for a viable company, but it might be prohibitive if you're the main contributor to a smaller open source project, and that money will have to come out of your own pocket.