3 ms·
While your usage is common, it is completely wrong. A "conspiracy theory" is simply a "theory" that posits a "conspiracy". What you describe is the opposite -
by michael1999 6y ago
While your usage is common, it is completely wrong. A "conspiracy theory" is simply a "theory" that posits a "conspiracy". What you describe is the opposite - when the evidence is so overwhelming, that the secrecy of the conspiracy can no longer be maintained. Room 641A was discovered in 2006 FFS. The reluctance of the press to acknowledge it has much more to do with propaganda, confused nationalism, concentrated press ownership, social/financial/legal influence from the military, and willful blindness.
The idea that "conspiracy theory"===false comes right out of COINTELPRO. You know, the big secret (at the time) conspiracy to subvert domestic US movements. In fact, much of the 20th C was defined by secret conspiracies - the Bolshevik revolution, the rise of the Nazis, every post-colonial coup, etc. Project Echelon was well understood in the 80s. What is the USS Jimmy Carter even for?
- nyolfen 6y agothe idea that conspiracy theories are spurious is a result of mentally ill people irrationally latching onto them and far predates cointelpro. that said, it is trivially true that the world is run by conspiracies -- conspiracy is simply a label for private agreement for coordinated action, which carries negative emotional valence as a result of that association.