There's valid criticism of Rust and then there's what you are doing, which feels distinctly like flat-earthism of computer science. You pick arbitrary goal post

There's valid criticism of Rust and then there's what you are doing, which feels distinctly like flat-earthism of computer science. You pick arbitrary goal posts (like, pretending that "unsafe" isn't a keyword in "real rust") and try use that to discredit a language that a lot of people have found super useful and superior in their work.