8 ms·
To me it seems disrespectful to publish someone's book under a different name from the one they chose to publish it under. Also, the name "George Eliot" having
by bloak 6y ago
To me it seems disrespectful to publish someone's book under a different name from the one they chose to publish it under.
Also, the name "George Eliot" having been chosen by the writer herself rather than by her parents doesn't make that name any less "real".
Obviously it's a bit sad that contemporary circumstances encouraged her to choose a masculine pen name, but it seems very likely from her biography that she would in any case have used some kind of a pen name for her novels in order to separate the novels from her other work. So perhaps someone should republish her novels under the name Georgette Eliot. That would make about as much sense as what they've done here.
It's also a bit sad that most English names are gendered. But we can't easily fix that with a pull request, can we?
- Hamuko 6y agoYeah, it feels kinda disrespectful since the author has no input on the thing. I guess if you really want to note how it's by a female author, you could have it as "Ms. George Eliot", although that seems rather tacky. >It's also a bit sad that most English names are gendered. Non-gendered names are actually pretty much illegal here, so the English way isn't really that crazy.
- TheSpiceIsLife 6y agoWhere is here in your context?
- Hamuko 6y agoFinland.
- narag 6y agoSome friends inscribed their child forty years ago, a month before the birth. It seems there was some kind of tax benefits that expired with the new year. They used the name Andrea. In Spain it's a female name, but they planned to argue that it's male in Italy and that they marked the wrong cell for the sex. In the end it was a girl, so no hassle, except her birthday is fake.
- unsupported 6y agoFun fact: Andrea comes from the Greek word andrós, which means man/male. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea#Origin_of_the_name https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea#Origin_of_the_name
- chrisseaton 6y agoWhat is their explanation for why they do this?
- Hamuko 6y agoI imagine it's to protect children from the Elon Musks of the world. There's a handful of rules that concern first names in Finland that allow to reject names that are bit "out there" so to speak. For example, there's such rejected first names as "Marihuana", "Avicii", "Kapteeni" (Captain), "Salaisuus" (Secret), "Noppa" (Dice), "Hoito Virhe" ("Medicial Malpractice" as first and last name) and "Sukka" (Sock). Guess the idea that giving a boy a girl's name can have a similar effect for the child as naming them "Sock".
- runarb 6y ago> I imagine it's to protect children from the Elon Musks of the world. Hade to look that up. He apparently named his son "X Æ A-12": https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52557291 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52557291 . Will probably create some issues with future IT-systems. I know a "Jo Å" and he have trouble registering for services from time to time.
- Hamuko 6y agoIt's actually "X AE A-XII" now since "X Æ A-12" was against California law.
- buzer 6y agoI don't think neutral names are illegal, they are just rare. Names like Kaino, Rauni and Muisto have couple of registrations per year with quite equal distribution between genders (https://verkkopalvelu.vrk.fi/nimipalvelu/ https://verkkopalvelu.vrk.fi/nimipalvelu/).
- Hamuko 6y agoNimilaki defines that a first name can only be accepted if it's "become a standard for the same gender". https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2017/20170946 https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2017/20170946
- buzer 6y agoI think that means that you wouldn't be able to give such a name in cases where it has become a standard for the other gender, meaning it would be tricky to add new neutral names. It's also quite new additition so I don't think there are any cases that have went to administrative court yet. According to https://www.kotus.fi/kielitieto/nimisto/henkilonnimet/etu-_ja_sukunimilaki_lyhyesti https://www.kotus.fi/kielitieto/nimisto/henkilonnimet/etu-_j... the standard for same gender is 5 people that are alive, i.e. once 5 men and 5 women have that name, it could be given to either gender. Not sure what would happen if there was a huge imbalance though (like 1000 women with the name & 10 men). At least Rauni and Kaino have been granted to both genders after the law came in effect.
- stevekemp 6y agoIt is interesting that Finland makes available the name-database, allowing you to search for people with a specific forename, or surname. I remember when I moved to Finland and learned of this I immediately went to search for people with the same surname as myself. After that I looked for people called "Steve". Steve is an English name, and a male name at that. The female version would be "Stephany". Yet despite that you can see that less than 5, and more than 0, women were registered as "Steve" between 1980 and 1999: https://verkkopalvelu.vrk.fi/nimipalvelu/default.asp?L=3 https://verkkopalvelu.vrk.fi/nimipalvelu/default.asp?L=3 That doesn't mean they were permitted to be named that at birth of course, it is probably other immigrants such as myself. But oddly fascinating.
- Hamuko 6y ago>That doesn't mean they were permitted to be named that at birth of course, it is probably other immigrants such as myself. But oddly fascinating. There are exceptions in the name law when it comes to people who have "connections to foreign countries".
- bengillies 6y ago> It's also a bit sad that most English names are gendered. fwiw the name George in English can be applied to women as well as men (though only rarely I guess). See for example Famous Five books
- SideburnsOfDoom 6y ago> To me it seems disrespectful to publish someone's book under a different name from the one they chose to publish it under. Article spends a lot of time discussing why they chose to publish under a male name. And why "chose" might not be a good word for it.
- tibbydudeza 6y agoDo you really think they wanted that in the first place ... they wanted their work published unlike the case of the Harry Potter author or the son of Stephen King who either wanted to try a new genre or become an author on his/her own merit ???.
- SideburnsOfDoom 6y ago> Do you really think they wanted that in the first place I'm sorry, I don't know what you're asking? What does "that" refer to? In any event your question is probably answered in the article (and if not, do further reading) and I'm not an expert on this subject, so what I "really think" is unimportant.
- rsynnott 6y agoI mean, in some cases it's going to be ambiguous. But in most cases it was likely because it was extremely difficult to be published as a women at the time.
- goto11 6y ago> But in most cases it was likely because it was extremely difficult to be published as a women at the time. I don't think that is true, since the publishers knew the identity of the authors (as far as I know). And there are some examples of women authors being very successful (e.g. Harriet Beecher Stowe). It is more likely they used a male pseudonym because they didn't want prejudice against women and women literature to affect reviewers and readers, and/or they wanted to protect their privacy (and reputation, if they were writing about scandalous subjects).
- kitd 6y agoI think the problem is that many people didn't, or even still don't, know that George Eliot was a woman. Which was kind of why she had to choose it in the first place (cf the Bronte sisters who had to do the same thing initially). Using her real name goes some way to restoring the respect to woman writers that wasn't there at the time. Ie there's a justice element to it too.
- TheOtherHobbes 6y agoI suspect people who don't know that George Eliot was a woman don't care about books anyway. Gender impersonation still happens, but not always in ways the Guardian would approve of. There's a core of male writers using female pseudonyms to publish romantic fiction, because no one is going to buy it if it's published under a male name. J K Rowling was - apparently - persuaded not to be Joanne by her publisher. But having a female name didn't keep Doris Lessing, Margaret Atwood, and many other women from having very successful careers.
- watwut 6y agoThe claim toward J K Rowling was that the female name would be disadvantage. She was not told it is impossible to succeed with female name nor that no one ever succeeded, just that the chance is lower. The romantic literature is outlier in this way - having female name is advantage.
- rsynnott 6y agoThe publisher may have effectively vetoed it, though; if you're an unpublished author, then what your publisher recommends can be very close to what your publisher dictates.
- chongli 6y agoJ K Rowling was - apparently - persuaded not to be Joanne by her publisher. But having a female name didn't keep Doris Lessing, Margaret Atwood, and many other women from having very successful careers. The argument at the time was that Harry Potter is a children’s book with a male protagonist and that boys would not want to read it if it was obviously written by a woman. It makes some sense, as boys are under tremendous pressure to demonstrate masculinity at school.
- renewiltord 6y agoShe's been dead for 150 years. No one who could conceivably be harmed is alive now. Diogenes comes to mind.
- hrktb 6y ago> It's also a bit sad that most English names are gendered. But we can't easily fix that with a pull request, can we? It happens on the receiving end mostly. The day a prominent female “George” rises high enough, more girls will be named George and the name will switch to a feminine perception most of the time It’s a funny phenomenon actually, there was studies on how the perceived gender mostly went from male/neutral to female, and rarely the other way round.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- chrisseaton 6y agoLots of women are called George. I know at least three and they’re different generations. If I heard someone was called George I don’t think I’d assume either way. I think that’s the whole point of why multiple female authors picked it as a pen name isn’t it?
- awinder 6y ago...really? Georgina / Georgia / Gina are common feminine forms (US anyways). The point of picking George was to pick an unassailably male name so no one would question if the works came from a female brain.
- chrisseaton 6y agoMaybe you're an expert on this subject and I don't know what I'm talking about, but I think the point was to pick an common ambiguous name, so people could assume it was male if that was their bias but that it was also female. Note that three of the authors in this collection independently picked George as a plausibly-male name. I don't think that's a co-incidence.
- awinder 6y agoI’m not picking a fight I just wanted to make sure I wasn’t walking into expert level trolling. It’s not an accident at all, you’re right. But this was not some happy thing in the 1800s. They picked George because it’s historically a male gendered name, so that small men would know they’re reading men’s work and it’s to be taken seriously and not laughed at in derision.
- goto11 6y agoLegally, the right to publish pseudonymously is part of the "moral rights" of the author. This does not necessarily expire the same as copyright expire. I believe in some countries moral rights never expire. Moral rights means for example you can freely publish Shakespeare (because copyright is expired) but you cannot remove his name as author - he still have the right of attribution.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- 2038AD 6y ago> To me it seems disrespectful to publish someone's book under a different name from the one they chose to publish it under. It's an interesting situation because it's obviously meant to honour the authors but in doing so it's speaking for them. It relies on the idea that these authors were women who took pseudonyms because of the society they were in rather than fully by choice. The description of George Sand stood out to me > Amantine Aurore Dupin, the 19th-century author better known as George Sand, who famously scandalised society by wearing male clothing and smoking cigars in public. Wouldn't using a masculine name and wearing masculine clothing be grounds to consider her in fact a him, a transgender man? Today, Marsha P. Johnson is considered to be a trans woman rather than a gay man yet she never used the term. Admittedly, Johnson also used feminine pronouns but so have many other gay men. It reminds me of Foone's Don’t Deadname the Dead https://foone.wordpress.com/2019/04/27/dont-deadname-the-dead/ https://foone.wordpress.com/2019/04/27/dont-deadname-the-dea...
- watwut 6y ago> It relies on the idea that these authors were women who took pseudonyms because of the society they were in rather than fully by choice. There is zero dichotomy between the two. Of course peoples choices are dependent on society they are in - both unconsciously and consciously as they weight consequences of their decisions. "Fully by choice" does not mean "you have to act like autistic person with no knowledge of society you operate in". > Wouldn't using a masculine name and wearing masculine clothing be grounds to consider her in fact a him, a transgender man? Not necessary. You cant translate our society into them that straightforwardly. Quoting wikipedia: "Sand was one of many notable 19th-century women who chose to wear male attire in public." The reasons varied from practical to basically expression of radical feminism. It also allowed her to go to places she could not go to otherwise. She might or might not be trans, but you cant judge it from this that easily.
- chownie 6y ago> "you have to act like autistic person with no knowledge of society you operate in". Don't disagree with anything you've written, but could you not do this? Autistic people have trouble with theory of mind (attributing thoughts and desires to others) we don't lack the capability to learn social norms. They're just not automatic to us.
- celticninja 6y agoMost English names are, but surely so are most other names too. I am sure there are exceptions, but let's say in Muslim naming traditions there are definitely male and female names, also in Chinese there are male and female names (sort of, as girls names tend to use certain characters and boys names use certain characters. So between English names, Chinese names and Muslim names I am guessing a pretty good coverage of world population, enough to say that it is more common that names are gendered, than for them to not be. I would love to hear a counterpoint or even example of alternatives. Oh almost forgot Iceland,not a huge population but changes the surname based on gender too, e.g Johnsson or Johnsdottir
- Razengan 6y agoParent-given names should be considered temporary until a person chooses their own at 20 or 25.
- bootcampwhere 6y agoWomen are a privlidged class in the west masquerading as a minority. This kind of B's just furthers their cause of playing the perpetual victim.
- JustSomeNobody 6y agoI agree it is disrespectful. A person's pen name is a part of the book itself; it adds to that book's character. You shouldn't change that just because 100 years later you want to make some point.
- goto11 6y agoAgree! Many authors used and use pseudonyms of their own gender, so it is not like the only reason to use a pseudonym is to avoid gender prejudice. The choice of pseudonym is part of the work itself. Some authors are very deliberate about it, e.g. Søren Kierkegaard wrote under a host of different pseudonyms, all deliberate chosen, and also published some books in his own name.