3 ms·
Why should we care about arguments in a random HN discussion? We should care about arguments from people who have done substantial work. Totals grouped by lang
by hmartins 6y ago
Why should we care about arguments in a random HN discussion? We should care about arguments from people who have done substantial work.
Totals grouped by language (dominant language first):
python: 578880 (54.33%)
ansic: 475310 (44.61%)
sh: 4073 (0.38%)
cpp: 3847 (0.36%)
asm: 1486 (0.14%)
objc: 761 (0.07%)
lisp: 502 (0.05%)
pascal: 353 (0.03%)
xml: 308 (0.03%)
csh: 21 (0.00%)
Most of pure Python is in the stdlib.
- phoe-krk 6y ago> We should care about arguments from people who have done substantial work. OK, we can drop the HN comments. Since Stefan Hajnoczi is a substantial QEMU contributor, how would you respond to the arguments linked in http://blog.vmsplice.net/2020/08/why-qemu-should-move-from-c-to-rust.html http://blog.vmsplice.net/2020/08/why-qemu-should-move-from-c...?
- anwkdjqd 6y agoSince the chief rust town crier arrived, even this comment is downvoted. No other language has such toxic people who don't do much actual work. Rust survives by cancel culture.