6 ms·

Nope, not when your choice affects the rest of us.

• bmcn2020 6y ago
  I tend to agree with the "no mandataroy vaccination" thought. I'm no anti-vaxxer, nor a believer in the "plandemic". But the vaccine should be voluntary and highly recommended for at risk groups. After all, they're the ones who would be impacted the most.
  • bkor 6y ago
    > I'm no anti-vaxxer, nor a believer in the "plandemic". But the vaccine should be voluntary and highly recommended for at risk groups. After all, they're the ones who would be impacted the most. That would not work. The high risk group would then get infected by other people. A vaccine isn't perfect. Similarly for people affected where you did not know beforehand that they would have a bad effect.
    • bmcn2020 6y ago
      OK I see your point. But then, if this is like the seasonal flu, then we'd have to be vaccinated regularly?
      • grogenaut 6y ago
        this is what people mean by a disease becoming endemic aka (with us).
  • bigbluedots 6y ago
    It's not only the 'at risk' who would benefit from not getting the disease: many people who have been infected have not completely recovered, and it's not clear what the long term effects of the disease may be. Other than that, if we want to stop the spread then a high percentage of people will need to be vaccinated, which is difficult when personal freedom is put above all else.