4 ms·
This article has no substance, and the tweets it links to explicitly contradict it's core message. Maybe the author isn't aware of the difference between Servo
by Certhas 6y ago
This article has no substance, and the tweets it links to explicitly contradict it's core message. Maybe the author isn't aware of the difference between Servo and Gecko?
https://twitter.com/gcpascutto/status/1293519587967983616 https://twitter.com/gcpascutto/status/1293519587967983616
> Fwiw, afaict, almost all Gecko / platform devs are unaffected (I'm pretty relieved about that, I started my day with a totally different feeling).
> These layoffs are still devastating personally, but if anything, Mozilla is not ditching Gecko.
and
> To combat some FUD: my Security and Hardening team working on Firefox also appears to have survived.
> I conclude that a secure Gecko is still considered key to achieving Mozilla's goals.
> I'm happy to still be here. We have key improvements in the pipeline that I want to ship.
- kgraves 6y agoThis is irrelevant to the discussion, the point being that Mozilla's financial position as a company needs to be discussed if it has any chance of surviving. This seems like a knock on effect from the recent layoffs. I wonder if they made Firefox Enterprise paid would have been a better option. EDIT: Downvoters not accepting reality obviously...
- Max_Mustermann 6y agoPointing out wrong "facts" that are used as arguments isn't relevant?