> But even if you value the environment at $0, other car manufacturers are going to benefit just as much from at least the FITC, so the argument is transient at

> But even if you value the environment at $0, other car manufacturers are going to benefit just as much from at least the FITC, so the argument is transient at best. My post should be read as: the position I think GP is taking is different to what you're responding to, but either way it's bullshit.