Obviously right on the numbers but I have to disagree with the notion that reporters and people are just making a lot of noise over the 0.1% of inevitable "bad

Obviously right on the numbers but I have to disagree with the notion that reporters and people are just making a lot of noise over the 0.1% of inevitable "bad calls". Usually only notable popular accounts get coverage over their censorship (or lack of). The number of such accounts is a few orders of magnitude smaller than the general userbase. Any network would want to protect these accounts from arbitrary bans and they probably do. Most big stories about social media censorship often include comments from company reps who stand by their decision. Stories ending in "Oops we made a mistake" tend to be much less common as far as I can tell. As such I'd say people are actually pretty good at identifying the cases that aren't just a "bad call" but a contentious matter.