4 ms·
I was responding to a comment that said: "The day that UPS will be obligated to deliver a first-class letter... for 55 cents". UPS is legally required to charge
by nickff 6y ago
I was responding to a comment that said: "The day that UPS will be obligated to deliver a first-class letter... for 55 cents". UPS is legally required to charge at least six times more, and cannot use letterboxes.[1] The use of letterboxes is a cost-savings; if it were not a competitive advantage, the USPS wouldn't need a law protecting it.
Whether or not UPS wants the business is beside the point, and they currently cannot have it.
[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/39/601 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/39/601
- triceratops 6y agoThe letterbox might have been a competitive advantage when people weren't accustomed to having stuff delivered to their porch. Not anymore. Ditto for a first-class mail monopoly - advantageous when people actually wrote letters, practically useless today.
- nickff 6y agoLetterbox delivery is a competitive advantage because it saves money on delivery; the driver can often drop letters off in a mail room at a multi-unit dwelling, or by the road in the suburbs/rural areas. We're only talking about first-class mail here, so a 6x cost advantage in first-class mail is very important.
- vkou 6y ago> Whether or not UPS wants the business is beside the point, and they currently cannot have it. It's the entire point actually. The key part of my post is: > The day that UPS will be obligated... to deliver a letter for 55 cents The USPS is forced to provide this service - at a ridiculously low price. The second that UPS and Fedex have to play by the same rules (By being forced to deliver negative-margin mail), they will stop being profitable.