> you've parroted Parroting implies blind repeating. I honestly believe my statement though. It's not parroting. > That's abusive, because it allows the emplo

> you've parroted Parroting implies blind repeating. I honestly believe my statement though. It's not parroting. > That's abusive, because it allows the employer to send you work when you're off the clock. No, it's abusive when doing work functions requires the use of my personal phone. Accessing an employer's VPN should not be done using devices or services that are wholly owned and paid for by me. Allowing my employer to notify me, while I'm off the clock, of any work that's available or scheduling changes or emergencies definitely falls under personal devices can be used. But when the employer requires you to use your personal devices and personal internet service to actually do any function of that work then that's where you and I clearly disagree. > Using your smartphone to log into your payroll site Payroll sites necessarily must be accessible from outside of the work VPN: payroll sites' reporting ability must be accessible after my employment has been terminated. > or as the internet bridge to the company VPN Using someone's personal internet service or phone service is unethical. Employers should pay for the internet bridge to the company VPN and all devices and services necessary to connect to it. > is not any different from using a broadband line and a laptop to do the same thing Nope, it isn't. Who owns it though? > Those systems shouldn't be able to interrupt you when you're not working Indeed. > but they might still be accessed through a smartphone in lieu of a desktop or laptop. Sure, but who owns it?