5 ms·
I'm in Palo Alto - sounds like maybe you are too? The best networking option available is Comcast Gigabit Pro (2gbps both up and down). I wrote up details her
by fossuser 6y ago
I'm in Palo Alto - sounds like maybe you are too?
The best networking option available is Comcast Gigabit Pro (2gbps both up and down).
I wrote up details here: https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/fs6un2/comcast_gigabit_pro/ https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeNetworking/comments/fs6un2/comc...
These two articles are also helpful:
- https://binaryimpulse.com/2019/11/comcast-gigabit-pro-install/ https://binaryimpulse.com/2019/11/comcast-gigabit-pro-instal...
- https://medium.com/@Gtwy/comcasts-2000mbit-fiber-to-the-home-f106d64d5f51 https://medium.com/@Gtwy/comcasts-2000mbit-fiber-to-the-home...
If you're not looking to spend that much, Comcast gigabit (non-pro) is cheap and gets you 1gbps down, but only 35mbps up. They're annoying to interact with, but once it's set up it's reliable.
Pro-tip: Ignore the Comcast website prices/packages. The only way to work with them is to call and get a friendly sales rep, then ask them to look through their options to find the best gigabit only plan (they have a lot more promotions available than they list online). This might take a few tries if you get someone on the phone that isn't very good. Comcast Twitter support is also pretty helpful.
You should be able to get something around ~$80, but it might require a multi-year contract to lock in the price. I also had to add $50/month to remove the 1TB cap because of this: https://www.reddit.com/r/Comcast/comments/dqwsnj/comcast_data_usage_doubles_for_no_obvious_reason/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Comcast/comments/dqwsnj/comcast_dat...
- stevenjgarner 6y agoThat is not gigabit. That is 35MB. Big difference. Internet MUST be symmetrical. There are too many essential peer-to-peer technologies for it to be anything but symmetrical.
- easton 6y agoGigabit Pro is symmetrical, normal Gigabit is not. Gigabit Pro is FTTH (whereas all of Comcast's other plans go over copper/DOCSIS3), and is symmetrical 2Gbps. For $300 per month with a mandatory $2k install, I might add. You have to call them to get a quote, but here's a good blog post with the important info: https://binaryimpulse.com/2019/11/comcast-gigabit-pro-install/ https://binaryimpulse.com/2019/11/comcast-gigabit-pro-instal...
- fossuser 6y agoIt's not 35mbps, it's 1gbps down and 35mbps up, internet "must be symmetrical" isn't true. 1gbps down and 35mbps up is a lot better than 35/35. For clarity, the gigabit pro (2gbps) is both up and down.
- leetcrew 6y agoto me, a symmetric connection is more of a "nice to have" than a "need". I have something like 400/25 right now. if I had 400/400 or even 1000/1000, I might consider reconfiguring my plex server to stream outside my LAN, but aside from that I can't think of any obvious application. can you list some of these "essential peer-to-peer technologies" that a normal person would be likely to use?
- admax88q 6y agoEven just backing up your shit to the cloud is way nicer with good upload. Its also a bit of a chicken egg situation. If the majority of internet users had good upload maybe some "killer" p2p apps would be developed.
- ThePowerOfFuet 6y agoI saw your future plan in your reddit post and I just wanted to let you know that the UDM Pro is a dumpster fire from a software perspective. Wait until they've got it stable, likely around 1.8 or 1.9.
- fossuser 6y agoThanks - yeah I ended up holding off because I saw the UDM Pro was unstable (also no NextDNS support yet). I'm currently still on the USG and regular comcast gigabit.
- notJim 6y agoWow, this is awful. I live in Portland, and have symmetric gigabit fiber from CenturyLink for $65/mo. Honestly baffling to me that people tolerate the politics of Silicon Valley.
- fossuser 6y agoI come from Western New York, where (at the time) 20mbps was the best available option and it was over $100. I hear things are a little better now (though 100mbps may still be the best available), but the options here are way better. I think 2gbps is rare to find anywhere?
- notJim 6y agoSure it's a great speed, but $300/mo plus a $2k install just to get a decent upload? Seems like market segmentation where they're basically just ripping anyone off who wants to run a little server or backup their files to the cloud.
- fossuser 6y agoYeah, it'd be nicer to have symmetric gigabit for less, but the gigabit pro is actual fiber to the home (it doesn't run over coax lines). Comcast includes a Juniper ACX2100 switch for layer 2 and bringing the fiber into the house. I thought that was pretty cool. (Well 'includes', you have to pay to rent it from them.)
- smilekzs 6y agoI'm in East Bay and also on Comcast gigabit non-pro only (no TV). Signed up at $90 with no contract and so far it's been as stable as I had in Seattle with CenturyLink (fiber to building). I did buy my own DOCSIS modem so that could be part of the equation.