3 ms·
It seems that the controversies in the comments come from the inexact title. It should have been ,,Why QEMU should incrementally move from C to Rust'', or somet
by xiphias2 6y ago
It seems that the controversies in the comments come from the inexact title. It should have been ,,Why QEMU should incrementally move from C to Rust'', or something similar, that reflects the content of the article better.
- roblabla 6y agoOr maybe people should read the post instead of reading too much into the title?
- afiori 6y agobut the title is important, it claims that the article will give sufficient reasons for QEMU to stop using C in some natural sense and move to Rust. if this is not the reflective of the content or it is a tongue in check exaggeration following a c common template (similarly to the "considered harmful" titles) it is reasonable to criticize the title (it is less reasonable to criticize the article under the assumed content)
- pdimitar 6y agoI'd expect a technical audience to be already aware that any such efforts can only ever be incremental -- so your elaboration would be redundant.