>and does not advance any line of thought, To me, it seems like a straightforward article and the line of thought is this: One person's "freedom" comes at the

>and does not advance any line of thought, To me, it seems like a straightforward article and the line of thought is this: One person's "freedom" comes at the expense of someone else's freedom. Or another way to state is: You're not living by yourself on this planet so "freedom" is not absolute but relative concept because of conflicting relations to others' freedoms. The middle 5 paragraphs in the article are examples in various domains of the above tradeoffs. The thesis of the blog article seems very clear to me.