3 ms·
It doesn't actually follow though does it? Some uber christian 20 y/o girl may want to get married and have kids within the year. Some 46 year old man might jus
by theelous3 6y ago
It doesn't actually follow though does it? Some uber christian 20 y/o girl may want to get married and have kids within the year. Some 46 year old man might just be looking to bone down with his peers.
Someone can use any of those premium features to facilitate any of those possibilities, and more. Having more likes or options to message along with a super-like doesn't mean someone is looking for anything in particular.
It is simply true that some people
> value the premium features differently and be willing to pay more or less for them too.
But that's it. There's nothing about age or whatever in there.
- EE84M3i 6y agoThe primary way that different demographics have different experiences on tinder is not related to who they're looking for, it's related to who's looking for them. Users that get lots of matches with minimal work fundamentally aren't going to pay as much for a product that is designed to get them more matches.
- theelous3 6y agoSo to follow your logic further, would you have any problem with charging black women and asian men more than everybody else too, as fewer people are looking for them, and they are more willing to buy a product designed to get them more matches? It's literally the same thing but with age. Just how much do you think we can squeeze out of 30+ black women eh? The practice is despicable. I'm not saying you're advocating for the above, but if the approach is to just extract the maximum because you can extract the maximum, which is the logic you're advocating, this is an expected result.