> what I'd call a standard Um, just calling a monopoly a "standard" doesn't make it so. There are already standards for the the web that are defined by the W3C

> what I'd call a standard Um, just calling a monopoly a "standard" doesn't make it so. There are already standards for the the web that are defined by the W3C. It is a win for a standard if there are multiple implementations rather than just one, not the other way round as you are claiming.