> something that's unanimously agreed upon amongst historians and economists Can you actually show this to be true? Lots of things in history is are pretty un

> something that's unanimously agreed upon amongst historians and economists Can you actually show this to be true? Lots of things in history is are pretty unique. At the time East India company was clearly not special, other institutions of that type that existed. And we can find clear precedents in history. Any attempted to really define colonialism will either be incredibly convoluted or equally aligns many other historical situations. Lots of what we call colonization is also not threw quasi-private space sponsored monopolies.