4 ms·
> one might have interest in the recent series of threads over in r/devops about people's differing experiences between datadog's _product_ and datadog's _organ
by vosper 6y ago
> one might have interest in the recent series of threads over in r/devops about people's differing experiences between datadog's _product_ and datadog's _organization_.
I briefly tried to find some of these, but I'm not clear on which threads you're referring to. If you have time to post some that'd be interesting to me.
The one I did find was someone complaining about being "scammed" but it seemed pretty clear that they'd enabled an extra paid feature, without understanding the pricing, and it didn't really seem like Datadog did anything wrong... So if that's all people are complaining about it doesn't seem very interesting.
- mdaniel 6y agoWe may be talking about the same thread: https://old.reddit.com/r/devops/comments/i63xxv/datadog_shady_billing_13000_for_1_month_what/ https://old.reddit.com/r/devops/comments/i63xxv/datadog_shad... but my take away wasn't from the original poster's story, it was from the numerous replies with their own story about the product being fine but the interactions with the business being suboptimal. I also came into that thread having just heard a similar story last week from an non-reddit source. "..., twice is coincidence, three times is enemy action," as the tale goes. Even surfing around the new comments _here_ seems to reinforce that same theme, so whatever the next phase is beyond enemy action, I'm pretty sure we've crossed that threshold