> he gave away all his wealth, which would be about $60 to every household in the world. No one is asking for such naive approach to redistribute wealth. It's

> he gave away all his wealth, which would be about $60 to every household in the world. No one is asking for such naive approach to redistribute wealth. It's to find better ways to utilize the wealth, which Bill himself would also agree in principle. What exactly the format requires discussion. But the first step is to allow such discussion to happen. And we are sure that a lot of the world people are not believing the meaningfulness of such discussion... And that's a big problem.