3 ms·
This is not a code editor. You're implying OP intends to abandon Mozilla based on their criticism towards corporate doublespeak. If not then your comment make
by hu3 6y ago
This is not a code editor.
You're implying OP intends to abandon Mozilla based on their criticism towards corporate doublespeak.
If not then your comment makes even less sense.
Let me phrase it clearly to anyone reading this: It is perfectly fine to criticize corporate double speak and people should not be confronted for that.
- dblohm7 6y ago"you think that Mozilla not using 'corporate doublespeak' is an impossible standard" is the predicate. If true, then they are proving my point. If false, then they aren't proving my point.
- hu3 6y agoAnd it makes no sense looking at OP's message which never mentions abandoning Mozilla. This is the entirety of it: > If you think that Mozilla not using "corporate doublespeak" is an impossible standard, I am left speechless.
- stale2002 6y agoOther people in this thread could think it is a reason to "abandon" Mozilla. Therefore, given that other people may think that, it is reasonable to bring it up. Not all parts of a comment are directes literally only at the person that one is responding to..
- nix23 6y agoI like Mozilla as a product forge, but i really don't see why you should have that massively overpaid Management, Marketing yes, Developers for sure...but management, more and more Mozilla smells like yahoo. But still great Product and the only Browser i use!