3 ms·
Original from 2018, 467 comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17723973 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17723973. Not commenting as snark (reposts a
by Pick-A-Hill2019 6y ago
Original from 2018, 467 comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17723973 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17723973. Not commenting as snark (reposts are ok after all) more to save Dang digging out the link and also to see how many more or less duplicate sentiment comments are made and / or how perceptions have changed.
- ColanR 6y agoI thought that first comment had some inappropriately personal things to say about ddvault and his article. It also seemed like they didn't really respond with substance to the what the article said.
- tptacek 6y agoWhat substance in the article did I miss? Unlike the author, I stand by what I wrote originally. I'll note the irony of calling my critique overly personalized, when the original article is based on the logic that Moxie's disagreement with DeVault's opinion about F-Droid --- a controversy that is meaningful to less than 1% of Signal's Android user base --- implies inexorably that Moxie is untrustworthy and disingenuous.