>but it's been inexorably losing market share for years to a direct competitor with vastly more financial muscle If you remember, they gained market-share by c

>but it's been inexorably losing market share for years to a direct competitor with vastly more financial muscle If you remember, they gained market-share by competing and beating another direct competitor with vastly more finical muscle. >It's hard to imagine they could give Firefox a significant technical edge over Chrome, no matter how much they focus on it. Have they tried? Why isn't Firefox front-and-center in this blog post. Why wasn't Firefox listed in their five areas of focus? But if their attitude is that they will never be able to compete with Chrome, maybe they should just adopt CEF and move on to building all those new products they alluded to. >Throwing all the eggs in one basket and praying is not a strategy. They have one egg, one basket. Firefox is the only thing that makes them relevant. Without Firefox they have nothing. That they have delusions of grandeur is their problem. To me, not having Firefox be the core focus of Mozilla is considerably more risky than trying to figure out new products.