3 ms·
You do get that the CEO has the most power in directing where the company goes and the CEO is directly reponsible, at least in part, for the current situation M
by shock 6y ago
You do get that the CEO has the most power in directing where the company goes and the CEO is directly reponsible, at least in part, for the current situation Mozilla is in. As a result I think the CEO should have been the first to suffer the consequences of the reality they were (partly) responsible for creating, before the first employee would have been impacted.
The way I see it, the employees that had almost no control over Mozilla's direction over the last years are suffering the consequences.
- Spivak 6y agoRight but this makes no sense except as some weird punishment thing. Like it seems it would be the same to you if they still fired all 250 employees but also cut the CEOs salary as a slap on the wrist. Like this stance is crazy if you apply it to anyone but the CEO. Can you imagine if you got punished for writing bad code or not making a project deadline by having your salary cut? Regardless of whether you think she's doing a good job as the CEO, she's still doing her job and deserves to be paid. Your just asking for CEOs to be company whipping boys.
- shock 6y ago> Can you imagine if you got punished for writing bad code or not making a project deadline by having your salary cut? But I do get punished as part of the regular Performance Review, if I don't do my job right. Luckily, I am very good at my job.