> At the same time, how can a single person decide the fate of a company in a different country? The single person was explicitly elected to speak and act on A

> At the same time, how can a single person decide the fate of a company in a different country? The single person was explicitly elected to speak and act on America’s behalf. The same single person is the commander in chief for America’s military, giving them quite a bit of power when interacting with foreign countries. And they’re impacting a foreign company’s operations in the US, something which seems to fall within the powers granted to them. In general, I don’t like what he’s doing, but the why and how in this case appear to be by the book.