> If the USA achieved global dominance, there would be no China. There would only be the USA That's really not what those words mean. "Dominance" is the fact o

> If the USA achieved global dominance, there would be no China. There would only be the USA That's really not what those words mean. "Dominance" is the fact or state of being dominant, not the state of being the only one in existence. So what I said is that the US dominates the world (geo-political, economic, military, etc.). Let's put it in more simple terms. If Mike Tyson dominated a boxing match it really doesn't mean he was prancing around alone in the ring. Just that if anyone contested that dominance he'd punch them harder. And if that didn't work he'd bite of their ear. Which is a far more appropriate analogy than it would first seem.