4 ms·
The image shown by wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_element https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_element seems more complete and better laid o
by jacknews 6y ago
The image shown by wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_element https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_element seems more complete and better laid out, and is also by cmglee (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Cmglee https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Cmglee), based on data from Jennifer Johnson at Ohio State University (http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~jaj/nucleo/ http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~jaj/nucleo/):
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/Nucleosynthesis_periodic_table.svg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/Nucleosy...
- nuccy 6y agoThis table was also featured at Astronomy Picture Of the Day website (APOD for short) few days ago [1]. Judging by the tags in the tweet, author took it from there. [1] https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap200809.html https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap200809.html P.S. After the comet C/2020 F3 (NEOWISE) is gone, pictures are again diverse and range from different fields of astronomy ;)
- spirographer 6y agoThis article gives the more detailed explanation of the chart's data. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis BTW, image search of nucleosynthesis gives about 10 different versions of this infographic, with fairly significant variation.
- LanceH 6y agoThe wikipedia entry is substantially different. The twitter version only labels 6 of 7 categories and what would appear to be multiple elements miscategorized.
- identity0 6y agoBrown: made by monkeys on terrestrial planets