Some comments here, in my opinion, are missing the point. Saying "SQL is good enough, no need for EdgeQL" is like saying "C/C++/Java/... is good enough, no need

Some comments here, in my opinion, are missing the point. Saying "SQL is good enough, no need for EdgeQL" is like saying "C/C++/Java/... is good enough, no need for Rust/Kotlin/...". EdgeQL is an explicit attempt to make not a new version of SQL, but a new language. It's about evolution, which is, again, explicitly noted. Saying "evolution is not needed" or "I don't want/need evolution" is strange to me. At the same time, giving constructive feedback is useful, as always.