3 ms·

So we trust no-one? There is a healthy level of scepticism but I think you are taking it a bit far. The data is what has been actually recorded by Tepco and ot

by cas 16y ago

So we trust no-one? There is a healthy level of scepticism but I think you are taking it a bit far. The data is what has been actually recorded by Tepco and others and is certainly reported in good detail without being fudged or sensationalised like the mainstream media is doing.

phlux 16y ago
It would seem that to trust no-one but be cautious of all reports is the correct stance. We know there IS radiation and we know that pretty much ANY radiation coming from any plant that has the words "disaster" "chernobyl" "meltdown" "breach" or any other range of descriptors is certainly BAD. So, take-aways == radiation escapes, radiation bad, don't know truth == stay very far away.