4 ms·
Sure, but an earlier system nonetheless. Similarly, I'd describe Windows 95 as backwards compatible with Windows 3, even if one might describe Windows 3.1 as a
by boomlinde 6y ago
Sure, but an earlier system nonetheless. Similarly, I'd describe Windows 95 as backwards compatible with Windows 3, even if one might describe Windows 3.1 as a contemporary system at the time of 95's release.
- toast0 6y agoWas OS/2 backwards compatible with Windows?