> That may be the author's point, but what he says is that PDF is unfit for human consumption. Which is absurd. You're quoting the click-baity title, but faili

> That may be the author's point, but what he says is that PDF is unfit for human consumption. Which is absurd. You're quoting the click-baity title, but failing to actually read past the article summary's first sentence. The summary's very first sentence states "Research spanning 20 years proves PDFs are problematic for online reading." This sentence alone frames the problem, and explains the whole point of it.