Actually, that presentation comes from an Areva engineer, not from Stanford. Here's the original (internal?) version: http://energyfromthorium.com/2011/03/30/a

Actually, that presentation comes from an Areva engineer, not from Stanford. Here's the original (internal?) version: http://energyfromthorium.com/2011/03/30/areva-fd-presentation/ http://energyfromthorium.com/2011/03/30/areva-fd-presentatio... Some interesting intrigue here. Apparently the version you linked redacts the author's name from the second page (Matthias Braun), and removes the signature with his name and the Areva logo from every following page. There's a NYT article that confirms this much: Stanford, where Dr. Hanson is a visiting scholar, posted the slides online after the March presentation. At that time, each of the roughly 30 slides was marked with the Areva symbol or name, and each also gave the name of their author, Matthias Braun. The posted document was later changed to remove all references to Areva, and Dr. Braun and Areva did not reply to questions about what simulation code or codes the company may have used to arrive at its analysis of the Fukushima disaster. “We cannot comment on that,” Jarret Adams, a spokesman for Areva, said of the slide presentation. The reason, he added, was “because it was not an officially released document.” http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/03/science/03meltdown.html?pagewanted=all http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/03/science/03meltdown.html?pa...