4 ms·
I like that logic. It works great for the 2nd amendment. You'll agree that an ID requirement for firearms is unacceptable, yes? Constitutional protections for
by burfog 6y ago
I like that logic. It works great for the 2nd amendment. You'll agree that an ID requirement for firearms is unacceptable, yes?
Constitutional protections for voting are far more limited.
- slg 6y agoThis thread is already on the verge of being too political for HN. I'm not going to take the bait and get into a debate about something that is not even tangentially related to the topic of the link.