2 ms·
That is NOT what the article says. It states: "In his 1947 book [...]Obafemi Awolowo, [wrote] “Given a choice from among white officials, [Nigerian] chiefs and
by jccalhoun 6y ago
That is NOT what the article says. It states:
"In his 1947 book [...]Obafemi Awolowo, [wrote] “Given a choice from among white officials, [Nigerian] chiefs and educated Nigerians as the principal rulers of the country, the illiterate man today would exercise his preference for the three in the order in which they are named. He is convinced, and has good reasons to be, that he can always get better treatment from the white man than he could hope to get from the chiefs and the educated elements,” [...]
"According to this, [...] many regular Nigerians seemed to sense a fairness in the British exercise of power that they were not so sure of in their own leaders."
So one author says that SOME people thought that the British were fairer. We don't know how many. And we don't know if they were right or wrong.
- trabant00 6y ago> SOME people thought that the British were fairer. We don't know how many It's right there in the quote: "many" > And we don't know if they were right or wrong. That's your other quote "He is convinced, and has good reasons to be, that he can always get better treatment from the white man" - the author's opinion, who was not an illiterate obviously: "has good reasons". Being right or wrong has nothing to do with it. Their lives, their country, their right to decide. You think you know better what's good for them, don't you?