4 ms·
What's funny, is that it hurts the consumer. Which (for worse) has been the reason to roll back all the antitrust laws that would have stopped Google from ever
by pkilgore 6y ago
What's funny, is that it hurts the consumer.
Which (for worse) has been the reason to roll back all the antitrust laws that would have stopped Google from ever becoming powerful enough to do this in the first place.
Google of course argues "faster results" are good for the consumer, but if you strip away the incentives for publishing information in the first place, you quickly end up with "bad results" then "no results."