:) Funny Of course we don't know what might or might not occur, if the situation were different. But the fact is that neither you nor I decided on roads. The

:) Funny Of course we don't know what might or might not occur, if the situation were different. But the fact is that neither you nor I decided on roads. The government decided. I don't see what's weak about that. The government is 'they', its not 'we' (though you may identify with its actions). I want no part of it, but despite my lack of agreement with anything that it does, it is inflicted on me anyway. I am coerced to pay taxes. You are in agreement with a system where a big gang can use their superior numbers to force another person to do what they say, despite that other person having done them no wrong. So, seriously, if you have a counter argument, please go ahead and make it. Please explain what number or percentage of people makes it ok to force another person to part with 40% of their income against their will. I'd like to hear your argument. Be sure to explain the difference between government tax and mafia protection money too. Cheers.