2 ms·
Brave and Vivaldi are both Chromium based, but perhaps worth a shot. There's only two other engines left: firefox and webkit. You may want to look into a webk
by axaxs 6y ago
Brave and Vivaldi are both Chromium based, but perhaps worth a shot.
There's only two other engines left: firefox and webkit. You may want to look into a webkit based browser?
- basch 6y agoill give Brave a nod as well. Everybody is so offput by its optional ads, they are missing out on the most efficient, fastest, and best "it just works" ad blocker out. It's a pleasure to surf the web again after years of ublock/umatrix and constantly having to tweak the settings for each site I visited. Edge has become my backup quick test of "is it something in Brave breaking it" I have Firefox open at all times as well, but find myself using it the least of the three.
- axaxs 6y agoYeah, Brave is probably my favorite as a browser. That said, its sync story sucks, which ultimately forced me over to Vivaldi.
- skinnymuch 6y agoNo other reason for Brave? Some don’t want to or care for blocking ads and others don’t do it at the browser level. Does Brave have anything at that point?
- basch 6y agoIt's hard for any browser to be "lightweight" without blocking javascript and ads. So of the ad blockers, Brave is the lightest weight. You could turn the ad blocker off, and still get paid to use Brave though, if you like ads.
- skinnymuch 6y agoIf ads or other things are already taken care of ourside the browser, doesn’t that make Brave heavier? It now has redundancy.
- piyush_soni 6y agoFirefox's browser engine is called 'Gecko' ...