3 ms·
I think you are conflating various parties and ignore the simple fact that we are explicitly not in Obama administration ( the "machine" comment notwithstanding
by A4ET8a8uTh0 6y ago
I think you are conflating various parties and ignore the simple fact that we are explicitly not in Obama administration ( the "machine" comment notwithstanding ). If there is one thing, one should have learned from the past three years, that executive powers has been largely consolidated in the hands of one person.
Now, I do think you have a point about entrenched bureaucracy and China 'planners' ( but the same is true for Iran, Venezuela, Cuba and a number of other advisors trying to push their pet agenda ); they may be a part of the branch, but the president, for better or worse, is its head ).
In a sense, US has gotten really 'lucky' with Covid. Here is a good propaganda reason to get people and the world against China. And yet, notice how varied the reaction was to the president's approach ( also for varying reasons ).
To say it is all part of a long term strategy is to ignore how chaotic it has been thus far.
- jonathannat 6y agoI think you meant to say clearly that the current US administration has a chaotic approach to China. Which is true. But keep in mind, a revolution is chaotic. And it is a revolution because this administration was the first in US and world to stand up visibily against China. Via tariffs. Via bans. Via sanctions. Via communique. Until the rest of the world recognized the danger and followed. So I would cut this administration some slack. Just like you would for a startup that's trying to change the status quo.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]