Yes but this mark is not Apple’s. Defending a trade mark is preventing people from using it to essentially sell products in your name. Thus, if one of the KIR

Yes but this mark is not Apple’s. Defending a trade mark is preventing people from using it to essentially sell products in your name. Thus, if one of the KIRFs that engadget profiles had an Apple logo, it’s on Apple to sue. But there’s no real requirement to go after things that are remotely similar, it’s just a dick move. What if John Deere sued Merrill Lynch? Both are using ruminants on their logos. Is it a failure to defend for Deere to not sue? Come on.