Crediting the source while providing the information has the same benefit for the user accessing that information, but not the same benefit for website presenti

Crediting the source while providing the information has the same benefit for the user accessing that information, but not the same benefit for website presenting that information. The website loses on whatever benefit a visiting user brings in e.g. advertising revenue, lead-in to a subscription / patronage, a plea for a donation etc. I still remain very much against ads, but I have a more sympathetic take to financing journalism as a result of reading this account. Perhaps just having the headline be free, but having the rest be behind a paywall is a better middle ground?