5 ms·
GraphicsMagick is a great alternative. It has given me great performance gains on large images as well as being able to perform better on resource-contrained en
by thunfischbrot 6y ago
GraphicsMagick is a great alternative. It has given me great performance gains on large images as well as being able to perform better on resource-contrained environments such as the RaspberryPi 1.
http://www.graphicsmagick.org/FAQ.html#how-does-graphicsmagick-differ-from-imagemagick http://www.graphicsmagick.org/FAQ.html#how-does-graphicsmagi...
- captainbland 6y agoI found you can actually get pretty good performance out of ImageMagick if you recompile it to use an internal 8-bit per channel colour (QuantumDepth, giving a per-pixel 'Quantum Size' of 32-bits) setting which is good enough for web graphics. By default ImageMagick seems to have something large like a 32-bit quantum depth (which is equivalent to a fairly massive 128-bit per pixel). I don't know how this compares to GraphicsMagick out of the box but it might be interesting.