9 ms·
I highly recommend doing some reading about what Xi and the CCP are really thinking and planning. It's a fascinating situation, and I'm not sure we or even they
by themgt 6y ago
I highly recommend doing some reading about what Xi and the CCP are really thinking and planning. It's a fascinating situation, and I'm not sure we or even they precisely know. But there has been a feel of a very dark turn overall in recent years, where perhaps an alignment between an appearance of widespread and growing failures of the US-led world order combined with China's unabated growing power, has cemented in many Chinese a sense that they truly do have the superior system. And if so we should expect to see continued growing trial runs of China flexing its increased power, in part just to see if anyone can stop them.
This recent piece from an influential Beijing professor Jiang Shigong[1] of "Xi Jinping Thought" fame, openly frames and justifies China seizing control as leader of the global empire, "Empire and World Order"[2]
[The current state of world empire] faces three great unsolvable problems: the ever-increasing inequality created by the liberal economy; state failure, political decline, and ineffective governance caused by political liberalism; and decadence and nihilism created by cultural liberalism. In the face of these difficulties, even the United States has pulled back in terms of worldwide military strategy, which means that world empire 1.0 is currently facing a great crisis, and that revolts, resistance, and revolution from within the empire are unravelling the system. ...
We might conclude that we are living in an age of chaos, conflict, and massive change in which world empire 1.0 is in decline and trending toward collapse, while we are as yet unable to imagine world empire 2.0. Yet we must recognize that change in the form of empire is a long historical process. The several thousand years of the history of mankind have witnessed only three great changes in imperial form, and each of these changes has been accompanied by great conflicts and chaos. At the same time, we cannot deny that these ages of historical transition have also created the opportunity for each civilization to construct world empire 2.0. The civilization that is able to provide genuine solutions to the three great problems facing world empire 1.0 will also provide the blueprint for world empire 2.0. As a great world power that must look beyond its own borders, China must reflect on her own future, for her important mission is not only to revive her traditional culture. China must also patiently absorb the skills and achievements of humanity as a whole, and especially those employed by Western civilization to construct world empire. Only on this basis can we see the reconstruction of Chinese civilization and the reconstruction of the world order as a mutually re-enforcing whole.
There really is a coherent internal logic to why China can solve the 3 problems identified with the liberal order. A very dystopian logic, in my opinion. But worth some serious thought; where this all is heading.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiang_Shigong https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiang_Shigong
[2] https://www.readingthechinadream.com/jiang-shigong-empire-and-world-order.html https://www.readingthechinadream.com/jiang-shigong-empire-an...
- xfs 6y agoI highly recommend doing some reading about Wallerstein's world systems theory and Kojin Karatani's The Structure of Empire, from which Jiang obviously drew his influence. If you think the global empire is something dystopian you may have misunderstood its use in its theoretical context.
- chvid 6y agoWhat is the dystopian logic here? That the us led world order eventually will collapse due to global inequality is pretty standard thought in communist thinking. And of course China sees itself as a more just society with basis in the worker rather than the capital holder.
- tomp 6y agoWhere did you read this propaganda that you're parroting here? In the past few decades, the global wealth inequality has decreased significantly (under the leadership of the "US empire" nevertheless). China isn't communist, it's just a dictatorship. Very capitalist. Huge inequality as well, growing faster than the West and approaching US wealth inequality. I can't see how there would be less inequality under the rule of the "Chinese empire".
- Kbelicius 6y ago> In the past few decades, the global wealth inequality has decreased significantly I'm guessing that you are thinking about the number of people that have risen from poverty (lead by China, not US) because I could not find one source that is talking about decreased global wealth inequality. In fact, every single source that I could find on a short notice is talking about the rise of global wealth inequality in the last few decades. Can you share your sources.
- tomp 6y agohttps://ourworldindata.org/global-economic-inequality#global-income-inequality-increased-for-2-centuries-and-is-now-falling https://ourworldindata.org/global-economic-inequality#global... > Global income inequality increased for 2 centuries and is now falling