For having spent some time playing with ripgrep and hyperscan (https://sr.ht/~pierrenn/ripgrep/ https://sr.ht/~pierrenn/ripgrep/) the benchmarking part looks re

For having spent some time playing with ripgrep and hyperscan (https://sr.ht/~pierrenn/ripgrep/ https://sr.ht/~pierrenn/ripgrep/) the benchmarking part looks really odd to me. The T5/T6/T7/T8/T9 are no way extensive enough to show a difference between hyperscan and ripgrep. Plus, the benchmark already includes the pattern compilation time in the hyperscan benchmarks so this makes even less sense. So the only upside left to this tool is usability. And from a quick test I don't really see the point. I'd prefer to use something written in a safe language (e.g. Rust) than this so I guess I'll just stick with rg.